Router CHINng-re0

6 Router CHINng-re0

6.1 Network topology around CHINng-re0

The network topology around router CHINng-re0 is shown in figure 17

Figure 17: Neighborhood of router CHINng-re0

In figure 17, a black arrow indicates that the IGP metric of the link did not change. A blue arrow indicates that the metric changed, but the link did not fail. A red arrow indicates that the link failed during the monitoring period.

6.2 LSPs produced by router CHINng-re0

This router produced the following LSPs during the monitored period.

This router produced 1469 LSPs 0000.0000.0015.00-00 during the monitored period. The evolution of the sequence number of those LSPs is shown in figure 18.

Figure 18: Sequence numbers of the LSPs produced by 0000.0000.0015.00-00

6.3 Prefixes advertised by router CHINng-re0

This router advertised the following prefixes :

prefix 2001:410:101:21::/64
- This prefix failed 1 times during the whose period. The evolution of its metric is shown in figure 19.
  
  Figure 19: Evolution of the IGP metric for prefix 2001:410:101:21::/64 advertised by router
prefix 3ffe:3900:a7::/64
- This prefix failed 1 times during the whose period. The evolution of its metric is shown in figure 20.
  
  Figure 20: Evolution of the IGP metric for prefix 3ffe:3900:a7::/64 advertised by router
prefix 2001:288:3b0:1::1a/127
- This prefix failed 1 times during the whose period. The evolution of its metric is shown in figure 21.
  
  Figure 21: Evolution of the IGP metric for prefix 2001:288:3b0:1::1a/127 advertised by router
prefix 198.32.12.236/30
- This prefix was up during the whole period. The metric of this prefix was set at 10 during the whole period.
prefix 2001:798:2022:10aa::c/126
- This prefix failed 1 times during the whose period. The evolution of its metric is shown in figure 22.
  
  Figure 22: Evolution of the IGP metric for prefix 2001:798:2022:10aa::c/126 advertised by router
prefix 198.32.8.82/31
- This prefix was up during the whole period. The metric of this prefix was set at 700 during the whole period.
prefix 2001:1458:e100:1000::5:10/126
- This prefix failed 1 times during the whose period. The evolution of its metric is shown in figure 23.
  
  Figure 23: Evolution of the IGP metric for prefix 2001:1458:e100:1000::5:10/126 advertised by router
prefix 2001:468:ff:f00::/56
- This prefix was up during the whole period. The metric of this prefix was set at 10 during the whole period.
prefix 198.32.11.96/30
- This prefix failed 1 times during the whose period. The evolution of its metric is shown in figure 24.
  
  Figure 24: Evolution of the IGP metric for prefix 198.32.11.96/30 advertised by router
prefix 198.32.8.160/30
- This prefix was up during the whole period. The metric of this prefix was set at 10 during the whole period.
prefix 198.32.8.238/32
- This prefix was up during the whole period. The metric of this prefix was set at 0 during the whole period.
prefix 198.32.10.200/29
- This prefix was up during the whole period. The metric of this prefix was set at 10 during the whole period.
prefix 2001:468:ff:12c3::/64
- This prefix failed 1 times during the whose period. The evolution of its metric is shown in figure 25.
  
  Figure 25: Evolution of the IGP metric for prefix 2001:468:ff:12c3::/64 advertised by router
prefix 2001:1458:e100:1000::5:0/126
- This prefix failed 1 times during the whose period. The evolution of its metric is shown in figure 26.
  
  Figure 26: Evolution of the IGP metric for prefix 2001:1458:e100:1000::5:0/126 advertised by router
prefix 198.32.12.16/29
- This prefix was up during the whole period. The metric of this prefix was set at 10 during the whole period.
prefix 198.32.12.196/30
- This prefix was up during the whole period. The metric of this prefix was set at 10 during the whole period.
prefix 198.32.154.156/30
- This prefix was up during the whole period. The metric of this prefix was set at 10 during the whole period.
prefix 2001:468:ff:12c2::/64
- This prefix failed 1 times during the whose period. The evolution of its metric is shown in figure 27.
  
  Figure 27: Evolution of the IGP metric for prefix 2001:468:ff:12c2::/64 advertised by router
prefix 198.32.154.152/30
- This prefix was up during the whole period. The metric of this prefix was set at 10 during the whole period.
prefix 2001:6d0:1:3::/64
- This prefix failed 1 times during the whose period. The evolution of its metric is shown in figure 28.
  
  Figure 28: Evolution of the IGP metric for prefix 2001:6d0:1:3::/64 advertised by router
prefix 198.32.8.193/32
- This prefix was up during the whole period. The metric of this prefix was set at 0 during the whole period.
prefix 2001:468:f::/48
- This prefix was up during the whole period. The metric of this prefix was set at 10 during the whole period.
prefix 198.32.8.76/31
- This prefix was up during the whole period. The metric of this prefix was set at 260 during the whole period.
prefix 2001:e10:ffff:304::/64
- This prefix failed 1 times during the whose period. The evolution of its metric is shown in figure 29.
  
  Figure 29: Evolution of the IGP metric for prefix 2001:e10:ffff:304::/64 advertised by router
prefix 2001:610:24:8128::/64
- This prefix failed 1 times during the whose period. The evolution of its metric is shown in figure 30.
  
  Figure 30: Evolution of the IGP metric for prefix 2001:610:24:8128::/64 advertised by router
prefix 198.32.154.176/29
- This prefix was up during the whole period. The metric of this prefix was set at 10 during the whole period.
prefix 198.32.10.16/28
- This prefix was up during the whole period. The metric of this prefix was set at 10 during the whole period.
prefix 2001:410:101:20::/64
- This prefix failed 1 times during the whose period. The evolution of its metric is shown in figure 31.
  
  Figure 31: Evolution of the IGP metric for prefix 2001:410:101:20::/64 advertised by router